The marketing advantages of strong brands

Topics: Brand, Brand management, Advertising Pages: 8 (3147 words) Published: February 19, 2015
Question 1: The marketing advantages of strong brands
There are many definitions of a strong brand, but in general it is assumed that a ‘strong brand’, or a brand with high ‘equity’, provides advantages to the brand’s owner (Wood 2000). These advantages allow the opportunity to charge consumers a premium price. Also, the product range of a strong brand can be extended (Spiggle, Nguyen and Caravella 2012). But moreover, a strong brand is less likely to be the victim of hostile competitive marketing activities (Wood 2000). Therefore, Tiwari (2010) argues that, a brand can be considered as a present asset and a relatively stable future cash flow. The marketing advantages of strong brands will be discussed according to the order of the 4Ps of marketing. The 4Ps comprise Product, Pricing, Place and Promotional marketing activities. The marketing advantages for strong brands in terms of the product are numerous. First of all, consumers perceive a higher degree of quality from strong brands in comparison to weak brands (Feinberg, Kahn and McAlister 1992). Strong brands are easier to recognize than unknown brands for the consumer and as a result, strong brands are often included in the choice set to reduce the perceived risk consumers might experience when dealing with uncertainty due to lack of prior knowledge of the product category. Hoyer and Brown (1990), argue that brand recognition in situations like these might be the strongest cue for making a purchase decision. Equally important, strong brands often experience more success from brand extensions. Not only are strong brands less vulnerable to negative perception of the extended product, the ‘halo effect’, the positive associations with the parent brand, often influence consumers’ opinions about the newly introduced brand extension. The parent brand could be considered to be the flagship brand and is highly resistant to dilution of other potential negative effects due to negative experiences with an extension (Roedder, Loken and Joiner 1998). As a result of the aforementioned perceived quality, strong brands are less vulnerable to low-pricing strategies of competitors. According to Kent and Allen, (1994) consumers are willing to pay a price premium for a strong brand. However, once a consumer has learned about a brand, “it is more difficult to change how the consumer thinks about that brand” (Hoeffler and Keller 2003 p. 435). An illustration is provided by Krishnamurthi and Raj (1991), they state that brand loyal households are influenced little by price sensitivity. Tellis (1988) argues that strong brands receive more attention, comprehension and retention from consumers in comparison to weaker brands. Kent and Allen (1994) support this position and add that consumers indeed pay more selective attention to advertising for well-known brands. Whereas repetitive advertising for weak brands is considered to have negative effects, strong brands, on the opposite, do not experience any negative effects from repetition (Calder and Sternthal 1980). In the same way as consumers perceive higher quality from strong brands, retailers that want to be perceived as high-quality retailers, will want to include strong brands in their product offerings (Montgomery 1975). A strong brand is a brand that people know about, i.e. brand awareness. Marketing activities related to strong brands are different from marketing activities relating to new or unknown brands. Therefore, the researcher will assume that the objectives that brand managers of a strong brand have, may deviate from the objectives of brand managers of an unknown brand. Consumers have many brand associations in their brains when it comes to strong brands. “Brand associations may also vary in their level of abstraction, ranging from concrete and specific (for example, product attributes) to more abstract and general (for example, overall brand attitudes)” associations (Hoeffler and Keller 2003 p. 422). Hoeffler and Keller (2003)...

References: AAKER, D., 1991. Managing Brand Equity. New York: Free Press.
AAKER, D., 1996. Building strong brands. New York: Free Press.
AAKER, D. A. and KELLER, K. L., 1990. Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(January), pp. 27-41.
ADLER, C., 2011. The man who makes Patek Philippe tick. Raconteur, 09 July, pp. 4-5.
BATRA, R., RAMASWAMY, V., ALDEN, D.L., STEENKAMP, J.E.M. and RAMACHANDER, S., 2000. Effects of brand local and nonlocal origin on consumer attitudes in developing countries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, pp. 83-95.
BERRY, L., 2000. Cultivating Service Brand Equity. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), pp. 128-137.
BLACKSTONE, M., 1992. Building Brand Equity by Managing the Brand 's Relationships. Journal of Advertising Research, 32(5), p. 5.
BLAIR, E. and INNIS, D., 1998. The effects of product knowledge on the evaluation of warranteed brands. Psychology & Marketing, 13(5), pp. 445-456.
CATRY, B., 2003. The great pretenders. Business Strategy, 14(3), pp. 10-17.
CHATTOPADHYAY, A., 1998. When does comparative advertising influence brand attitude? The role of delay and market position. Psychology & Marketing, 15(5), pp. 461-475.
DANZIGER, P. N., 2013. What Makes Patek Philippe Brand Run? It 's Lifestyle Branding. [Online]
Avaiable from: http://www.parexcellencemagazine.com/the-luxury-market-business/what-makes-patek-philippe-brand-run-its-lifestyle-branding.html
DERBAIX, C., 1995. The Impact of Affective Learning on Attitudes Toward the Advertisement and the Brand: A Step Toward Ecological Validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(November), pp. 470-479.
FEINBERG, F. M., KAHN, B. and MCALISTER, L., 1992. Market Share Response When Consumers Seek Variety. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(2), pp. 227-237.
FELDWICK, P., 1996. What is brand equity anyway, and how do you measure it?. Journal of the Market Research Society, 38(2), pp. 85-104.
GRUCA, T., 1989. Determinants of Choice Set Size: an Alternative Method For Measuring Evoked Sets. Advances in Consumer Research Volume, Volume 16, pp. 515-521.
HOEFFLER, S. and KELLER, K. L., 2003. The marketing advantages of strong brands. Journal of Brand Management, 10(6), pp. 421-455.
HOLLENSEN, S., 2011. Global Marketing: A decision-oriented approach. 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson Educated Limited.
INTERBRAND, 2013. Best Brands. [Online]
Avaiable from: http://interbrand.com/assets/uploads/Interbrand-Best-Asian-Brands-2013.pdf
KAPFERER, J., 2001. Reinventing the Brand: Can Top Brands Survice the New Market Realities?. London: Kogan Page.
KELLER, K. L., 1993. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customerbased brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(January), pp. 1-22.
KELLER, K. L., APÉRIA, T. and GEORGSON, M., 2012. Strategic brand management: a European perspective. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall/Financial Times.
KENT, R. J. and ALLEN, C. T., 1994. Competitive interference in consumer memory for advertising: 'The role of brand familiarity '. Journal of Marketing, 58(6), pp. 97-105.
NOWLIS, S. and SIMONSON, I., 1996. The Effect of New Product Features on Brand Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(1), pp. 36-46.
NUENO, J. L. and QUELCH, J. A., 1998. The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons, Volume November/December.
PARK, K., 1997. Fashion usage behaviour: Differences by product type. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 1(3), pp. 215-222.
PATEK PHILIPPE, 2014. Our Retailer Difference. [Online]
Avaiable from: http://www.patek.com/contents/default/en/retailerdifference.html
PATEK PHILIPPE, 2014. Corporate Advertising. [Online]
Avaiable from: http://www.patek.com/contents/default/en/advertisinginstitutional.html
PATEK PHILIPPE, 2014. Patek Philippe Salons. [Online]
Avaiable from: http://www.patek.com/contents/default/en/findsalon.html
PATEK PHILIPPE, 2014. Product Advertising. [Online]
Avaiable from: http://www.patek.com/contents/default/en/advertisingcampaign.html
PATEK PHILIPPE, 2014. Tiffany Anniversary. [Online]
Avaiable from: http://www.patek.com/contents/default/en/tiffany_anniversary.html
PATEK PHILIPPE, 2014. Values. [Online]
Avaiable from: http://www.patek.com/contents/default/en/values.html
SPIGGLE, S., NGUYEN, H. and CARAVELLA, M., 2012. More Than Fit: Brand Extension Authenticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), pp. 967-983.
STERN, T., 2014. In Conversation With Thierry Stern, President, Patek Philippe [Interview] (22 April 2014).
TELLIS, G. J., 1988. Advertising exposure. loyalty and brand purchase: A two-stage model of choice. Journal of Marketing Research, Volume 25, pp. 134-144.
THAKOR, M. and KATSANIS, L., 1997. A model of brand and country effects on quality dimensions: issues and implications. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(3), pp. 79-100.
TIWARI, M., 2010. Separation of Brand Equity and Brand Value. Global Business Review, 11(3), pp. 421-434.
WOOD, L., 2000. Brands and brand equity: Definition and Management. Management Decision, 38(9), pp. 662-669.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Marketing and Brand Research Paper
  • Essay on What Is a Brand, and Why Is a Strong Brand Important?
  • Building Strong Brands Essay
  • Modern Marketing Communication: Building Strong Brands Essay
  • Brand Marketing Essay
  • marketing local brand overseas Essay
  • Essay on Marketing Plan: Developing Strong Brands
  • A strong brand Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free
Nonfiction Books | Read more... | Real Class - Elementary Kid Teachers