The role of finance in economic growth is assessed here as part of a comparison between two European peripheries – Scandinavia and southern Europe- in the second half of the nineteenth century. It reveals that financial development was much greater in the former region, a fact explained because Scandinavian financial institutions were better not only at mobilizing the funds of the public but also at transforming them into credits available to the non-financial private sectors of the economy. Different per capita income levels, through savings, influenced this outcome but exogenous factors arising out politics, society and culture appear to have been more important still in this process.
Financial Systems in the Periphery:
A Nineteenth Century Comparison of Scandinavia and Southern Europe
Instituto de Ciências Sociais
Rua Miguel Lupi, 18 r/c
One of the strongest ideas in circulation concerning economic growth attributes an important role to financial intermediation in determining long run macro economic performance. Recent comparative studies have shown that the rise in real GDP per capita since 1960 is strongly associated with the size, structure and scope of the respective financial systems (King and Levine, 1993; Levine, 1997). The reasons for this have been clear for some time. Financial institutions provide money in response to the mounting demand for real cash balances and consequently help reduce the cost of transactions. They supply improved entrepreneurship for firms, which enables the latter to use financial resources better and thus to contribute to increases in TFP. By gathering information on clients, projects and technologies more cheaply, through economies of scale, they become able to reduce risks, attract more savings and combine the latter into loans of a scale that would be beyond the reach of non-institutional actors. Their capacity to monitor borrowers over time permits investment in projects with a higher average return (and risk). All of this implies a larger amount of finance available at a relatively lower price and a better allocation of resources. Historical studies in this vein, although part of a long tradition, are not frequent and have often been based on single countries. When comparative, they have focused prevalently on the regulatory and institutional aspects of the problem, asking what was the impact of this on the efficiency with which banking systems allocated resources among competing ends. The basic element in these enquiries is the classic dichotomy between two contrasting arrangements: the universal, bank-oriented, Continental system, and the Anglo-Saxon, functionally specialised, market oriented system (Ziegler, 1998). Although fundamentally concerned with the influence this had on growth, only a few of these studies have actually tested this relationship quantitatively, and the debate over the respective allocative merits of these systems continues to rage, still, it seems, inconclusively (Kennedy,1987; Calomiris, 1995; Collins, 1998; Fohlin, 1999). Some studies, however, have directed their attention to a more rigorous verification of the generally assumed relationship between finance and economic growth. These exercises have shown that from the mid 19th century long run structural relationships did exist between the two variables. They have also brought to light, in some cases, the exogeneity of the financial variable and the fact that finance Granger-caused growth (Hansson and Jonung, 1997; Wachtel and Rousseau, 1995 and 1998; Rousseau and Sylla, 2001). Any such research obviously requires a considerable amount of compilation of historical financial statistics. The bulk of the historical literature has paid relatively little attention, however, to quantifying the evolution of the scale and structure of national financial systems over the long run and making these results...
References: A’Hearn, B. (2000). Could southern Italians cooperate? Banche Popolari in the Mezzogiorno. Journal of Economic History 60, pp. 67-93.
Aleotti, A. (1990). Borsa e Industria. 1869-1989: Cento Anni di Rapporti Difficili. ???: Edizioni di Comunitá.
Beck, T., Levine, R. and Loayza, N. (2000). Finance and the sources of growth. Journal of Financial Economics 58, pp. 261-300.
Berthelemy, J. C. and Varoudakis, A. (1996). Economic growth, convergence clubs and the role of financial development. Oxford Economic Papers 48, pp.300-28.
Broder, A. (1976). Les investissements étrangers en Espagne au XIXe siècle: méthodologie et quantification. Revue d’Histoire Économique et Sociale 54, pp.29-63.
Brück, C. (ed.). (1995). Les Caisses d 'Épargne en Europe. Paris: Editions de l’Épargne, 2 vols.
Calomiris, C. (1995). The Costs of Rejecting Universal Banking: American Finance in the German Mirror, 1870-1914 in N. Lamoureaux and D. M. Graff (eds), The Coordination of Activity within and between Firms (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Cameron, R. (1967). Banking in the Early Stages of Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, R. (ed.). (1992). Financing Industrialization. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 2 vols.
Capie, F., Goodhart, C., Fischer, S. and Schnadt, N. (eds) (1994). The future of Central banking. The tercentenary symposium of the Bank of England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carreras, A. (ed.) (1989). Estadisticas Historicas de España Siglos XIX-XX. Madrid: Fundacion Banco Exterior.
Comin y Comin, F. (1989). Hacienda y Economia en la España Contemporanea
Michael Collins (1998), ‘English Bank Development within a European Context, 1870-1939’, Economic History Review, LI, pp.1-24.
Cova, A. and Galli, A. M. (1991). La Cassa di Risparmio delle Provincie Lombarde dalla Fondazione al 1940. Milan: Cariplo-Laterza.
Curioni, S. B. (1995). Regolazione e competizione. Storia del mercato azionario in Italia (1808-1938). Bologna: Il Mulino.
Eichengreen, B. (1998). 'Economics and culture in the writing of financial history '. In P. Cottrell and J. Reis (eds), Finance and the Making of the Modern Capitalist World, 1750-1913. Madrid: Fundacion de la Historia Economica.
Egge, Å. (1983). Transformation of bank structures in the industrial period: the case of Norway 1830-1914. Journal of European Economic History 12. pp. 271-94.
Esteves, R. P. (2002). Finanças Públicas e Crescimento Económico. O Crowding Out em Portugal da Regeneração ao Final da Monarquia. Lisboa: Banco de Portugal.
Fisher, D. and Thurman, W. N. (1989). Sweden’s financial sophistication in the nineteenth century: an appraisal. Journal of Economic History, 49, pp. 621-34.
Fohlin, C. (1999). Capital mobilisation and utilisation in latecomer economies: Germany and Italy compared. European Review of Economic History 3, pp. 39-74.
Fohlin, C. (2002). Regulation, taxation and the development of the German universal banking system, 1884-1913. European Review of Economic History 6, pp. 221-54.
Forsyth, D. J. and Verdier, D. (2003). The Origins of National Financial Systems. Alexander Gerschebkron Reconsidered. London: Routledge.
Fritz, F. (1989). Banking and bank legislation in the Scandinavian countries, 1880-1920 '. In Uppsala Papers in Economic History, Working Paper #2.
Galassi, F. (2001). Measuring social capital: culture as an explanation of Italy’s economic dualism. European Review of Economic History 5, pp. 29-59.
Garcia Lopez, J. A. (1989). El sistema bancario español del siglo XIX: Una estructura dual? Nuevos planteamientos y nuevas propuestas. Revista de Historia Económica VII, pp.111-32.
Goldsmith, R. W. (1969). Financial Structure and Development. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Goldsmith, R. G. (1985). Comparative National Balance Sheets. A Study of Twenty Countries, 1688-1978. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grossman, R. S. (2001). Charters, corporations and codes: entry restrictions in modern banking law. Financial History Review 8, pp.107-21.
Guinnane, T. (1994). A failed institutional transplant: Raiffeisen ‘s credit cooperatives in Ireland, 1894-1914. Explorations in Economic History, 31, pp. 38-61.
Guinnane, T. and Henriksen, I. (1998). Why Danish credit co-operatives were so unimportant. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 46, pp.32-54.
Hansen, P. H. (1991). From growth to crisis: the Danish banking system from 1850 to the inter-war years. Scandinavian Economic History Review 39, pp. 20-40.
Hansen, P. H. (2001). Bank regulation in Denmark from 1880 to World War II: public interets or private interests. Business History 43, pp.43-68.
S. Å Hansen (1982). The transformation of bank structures in the industrial period. The case of Denmark. Journal of European Economic History 3, pp. 575-603.
Hansen, S. Å. (1970). Early Industrialisation in Denmark. Copenhagen: Gads Forlag.
Hansson, P. and Jonung, L. (1997). Finance and economic growth: the case of Sweden, 1834-1991 Research in Economics 51, pp. 275-301.
Hertner, P. (1981). Il capitale straniero in Italia (1883-1914). Studi Storici…, pp. 767-795.
Homer, S. and Sylla, R. (1996). A history of interest rates (3rd ed. revised). New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press.
Johansen, H. C. (1991). Banking and Finance in the Danish Economy. In R. Cameron and V. I. Bovykin (eds), International Banking 1870-1914. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johansen, H. C. (1985). Dansk Økonomisk Statistik 1814-1980. Copenhagen: Gyldendals.
Justino, D. (1994). História da Bolsa de Lisboa. Lisboa: Bolsa de Valores de Lisboa.
Kennedy, W. P. (1987). Industrial Structure, Capital Markets and the Origins of British Economic Decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, R. G. and Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, pp. 717-37.
Sverre Knutsen (2003). The development of a hybrid structure in Norway: banks and economic change in the European periphery 1870-1913. In D. Forsyth and D. Verdier. (eds), The Origins of National Financial Systems: Alexander Gerschenkron
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F, Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. (1997), ‘Legal Determinants of External Finance’ Journal of Finance, 52, pp. 1131-50.
Lains, P. (2002). História da Caixa Geral de Depósitos 1876-1910: Politica e Finanças no Liberalismo Português. Lisboa Imprensa de Ciencias Sociais.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document